Tweaking, Cupping, Buttocks, Stunt Bottoms
Radley put up this amusing post about his “research” that includes learning about the regulations facing strippers who want to pretend to masturbate on stages of at least 18″ off the ground. This includes a discussion on tweaking vs. cupping.
Her: Hmm. Well, there’s no toy play. And a dancer isn’t allowed to touch herself on stage.
[RB]: At all?
Her: Well, no, not at all. But, you know. She can’t, like, pleasure herself.
[RB]: Ah. So she can’t touch her genitals.
Her: She can touch them, but she can’t masturbate. Or pretend to. No penetration.
[RB]: Gotcha. Can she touch other parts of her body?
Her: She can, but it can’t be stimulating. So she can cup or squeeze her breasts, but she isn’t allowed to tweak her nipples, for example.
[RB]: So the difference between cupping and tweaking is the difference between following the law or breaking it?
You should read the entire thing. This reminds me a few lines in the chick flick Notting Hill
Anna Scott: What’s so annoying is now I’m so totally fierce when it comes to nudity clauses.
William: You have clauses in your contract?
Anna Scott: Yeah. “you may show the dent at the top of the artist’s buttocks, but neither cheek or if a stunt bottom is being used, artists must have full consultation”.
William: You have a stunt bottom?
Anna Scott: I *could* have a stunt bottom, yes.
William: Are people tempted to go for better bottoms than their own?
Anna Scott: Well yeah, I would. This is important stuff.
William: Hell of a thing to put on your passport, Occupation “Mel Gibson’s bottom”
Anna Scott: Actually Mel does his own ass work. Well why wouldn’t he?
No obviously related posts.
